✅ Paper Submission Checklist
✅ Paper Submission Checklist
Use this checklist before every paper submission. A missed item at submission time can mean rejection, disqualification, or an embarrassing post-acceptance correction.
Phase 1: Research Completeness (2–4 weeks before deadline)
Experiments
- All baseline comparisons are fair and complete (same data, same evaluation protocol)
- Ablation studies isolate the contribution of each major component
- Results are reported over multiple seeds with mean ± std
- Statistical significance is assessed where appropriate
- Test set was used only once to report final results
- No data leakage between train/val/test splits
Reproducibility
- All random seeds are fixed and reported
- Hardware and software environment is documented
- Full hyperparameter configuration is available (in paper or supplementary)
- Code is ready for release (or will be before camera-ready)
- Model checkpoints are saved for the results being reported
Phase 2: Writing Completeness (1–2 weeks before deadline)
Content
- Abstract clearly states the problem, approach, and key results (with numbers)
- Introduction has an explicit contributions list (3–5 bullet points)
- Related work addresses all directly competing methods
- Methodology section is sufficiently detailed for an independent implementation
- Experiments section explains the experimental setup completely
- Every claim is backed by evidence (citation, equation, or empirical result)
- Limitations are acknowledged (required by most venues)
- Ethics/Broader Impacts statement is complete (required by NeurIPS, ICML, etc.)
Figures and Tables
- All figures have captions that are self-contained (understandable without reading the text)
- All tables have captions
- Axes are labeled with units
- All figures use colorblind-safe palettes
- Error bars or confidence intervals are visible where applicable
- Figures are in vector format (PDF) or ≥300 DPI raster
Equations
- All variables in equations are defined
- Equation numbering is consistent
- Mathematical notation is consistent throughout
- Equations compile without errors
Phase 3: Formatting and Compliance (3–7 days before deadline)
Venue Compliance
- Correct venue template is being used (download fresh from venue website)
- Paper is within the page limit (not counting references and appendix, unless specified otherwise)
- Supplementary material is within the page/file-size limit
- Paper is anonymized if the venue uses double-blind review:
- Author names and affiliations removed
- “In our previous work [X]” → “In prior work [X]”
- GitHub links removed or anonymized (use Anonymous GitHub)
- Acknowledgments section removed
- No identifying metadata in PDF properties
Technical
- PDF compiles without errors or warnings
- PDF is below the file size limit (typically 10–50 MB)
- All fonts are embedded (check with
pdffonts paper.pdf) - All hyperlinks work (test every URL)
- References are complete — no
[?]or??placeholders - BibTeX entries are complete and formatted correctly
- No “TODO” or “FIXME” comments remaining in the paper
Final Read-through
- Read the paper aloud once — catches awkward phrasing and missing words
- Have at least one person outside your immediate lab read the paper
- Check the abstract matches the paper’s actual contributions
- Check the conclusion matches the paper’s actual results
Phase 4: Submission Day
Submission System
- Account is created on the submission system (CMT, HotCRP, OpenReview, etc.)
- Paper is registered (often a separate step from submission with an abstract deadline)
- Authors are listed in the correct order with correct affiliations
- Keywords/topics are selected appropriately
- Conflicts of interest are declared correctly
- Supplementary materials uploaded in the correct format
Final Checks
- Submit at least 2 hours before the deadline — systems crash under load at deadlines
- Download the submitted PDF and verify it matches what you intended
- Confirm submission receipt email
- Note the paper ID / submission number for reference
Phase 5: Post-Submission
- Upload preprint to arXiv (if embargo period allows)
- Update Google Scholar profile
- Share on Twitter/X with paper link and brief description
- Archive submission code with DVC/Git tag:
git tag submission-venue-year
Resources
- Anonymous GitHub — Anonymous code submission for double-blind review
- pdffonts — Check font embedding
- NeurIPS Checklist — Official reproducibility checklist